Stay connected and inspired with our monthly newsletter! Each edition features reflections on our work, insights into key themes, and updates on projects and events. We share thought-provoking perspectives, practical tools, and relevant resources to support ongoing learning and engagement. Whether you’re new to our work or a long-time follower, our newsletter offers fresh inspiration each month. Sign up today and be part of the conversation!

January 2026
When the whole Organisation Froze

Last month, a leadership team sat across from us, silent. They'd called for help with "strategic planning," but no one could articulate what strategy they actually needed. The director finally spoke: "We keep having meetings where nothing gets decided. Everyone's working incredibly hard, but we're not moving forward. What's wrong with us?"

Nothing was wrong with them. Their organisation was in freeze, a collective nervous system response to overwhelming crisis.

The Organisation as Body

We asked them to map the last three months. Funding uncertainty. Two key staff departures. Political shifts threatening their core programs. A board pushing for answers they didn't have. Each crisis alone would be manageable. Together, they'd triggered organisational shutdown.

"Show me your decision-making process," we said. They described: gather information, discuss options, identify concerns, table the decision for more input, repeat. Classic freeze: the illusion of activity masking paralysis.

But here's what old leadership models miss: this wasn't a strategy problem. Their nervous system was doing exactly what it should when overwhelmed; conserving energy, scanning for threats, avoiding action that might make things worse. You can't think your way out of a body response.

From Individual Regulation to Systemic Change

We started with somatic intelligence, helping each leader notice their own freeze. The director's held breath during difficult conversations. The program lead's tension headaches before board meetings. But individual awareness alone doesn't shift organisational patterns.

The real work was structural: What systems were amplifying the freeze? Their decision-making required consensus from eight people before anything could move forward, designed during stable times, now creating bottlenecks. Their weekly "updates" had become anxiety-sharing sessions with no space for actual processing. Their funding model concentrated all risk at the director level, leaving everyone else powerless but worried.

We redesigned decision authority who actually needs to be involved in what. Created separate spaces for emotional processing and strategic thinking. Distributed financial literacy across the team, so everyone understood the real constraints, not whispered rumors.

Discomfort Capacity at the System Level

Three months in, they faced a brutal choice: close a beloved program or cut salaries across the board. Old leadership patterns would have rushed to a decision, prioritizing appearing competent over acknowledging genuine uncertainty.

Instead, the director brought the dilemma to the full staff: "This is where we are. I don't know the right answer. I need us to sit with this together before we decide."

They spent a week in that discomfort. Staff brought perspectives leadership hadn't considered. Someone proposed a hybrid approach that preserved core elements while transforming delivery. The solution emerged from collective wisdom, not hierarchical decree.

But here's what mattered most: they changed how power functioned. Marginalised staff, those usually excluded from "strategic" decisions, were centered in the process. Their lived experience of scarcity, of having to be creative with nothing, became valuable expertise rather than a deficit to overcome.

That's decolonial leadership: not the lone visionary deciding for others, but power redistributed so wisdom can emerge from unexpected places.

Building Organisations That Can Navigate Crisis

The freeze lifted not because they got better at pushing through, but because they rebuilt their structure to match their reality. They still face crisis, funding is still uncertain, the political climate hasn't improved. But now they have an organisational body that can stay present with difficulty, make decisions from groundedness rather than panic, and trust that the way forward lives in their collective capacity.

Is your organisation stuck in patterns that worked before but fail now? Let's explore what it means to rebuild systems for the crisis you're actually in. These aren't quick fixes, they're conversations about structural change. Reach out to info@relate-and-transform.org when you're ready.

December 2025
The Care Budget That Said Everything

We reviewed an organizations crisis budget with leadership. What stayed were executive salaries, core programs, and fundraising capacity. What disappeared were wellness stipends, professional development, mental health days, and the part time care coordinator role. “

We will restore these when we are stable,” the director said.

When we asked staff confidentially what message they received, a queer staff member replied, “We matter when we are productive. When resources shrink, care vanishes. That tells me exactly where I stand.”

When Duty of Care Becomes Conditional

This dynamic appears everywhere. Many organizations praise care until a crisis arrives, then treat it as optional. Leaders frame this as realism, but it reduces care to a luxury instead of seeing it as infrastructure. Budgets communicate values. When care is cut and executive pay is protected, the message is clear about whose well being counts.

The impact of these cuts is uneven. The care coordinator supported marginalized staff who were already navigating external oppression and internal stress. Losing that role harmed those carrying the heaviest burdens. Crisis care is political because not everyone has the same survival margin, and cuts that appear universal often deepen inequity.

What Co Regulation Requires Structurally

We helped the organization rebuild care as a system rather than a perk. We created protected time in schedules for processing stress. Meetings opened with space to acknowledge difficulty before discussing solutions. We assigned explicit responsibilities for care work, making visible the labor previously absorbed mostly by marginalized staff.

Decision making also shifted. Instead of leadership deciding what staff needed, we built structures that allowed staff especially those most affected by crisis to name their own requirements. When leaders finally asked what marginalized staff needed, the answers surprised them. People wanted flexibility, autonomy, and trust. They wanted to be believed when they named harm, without proving it repeatedly. They wanted freedom from micromanagement so they could regulate their energy.

The care coordinator role returned, now supervised by a staff committee. The message changed from “care will return when convenient” to “care is structural, and you help shape it.”

Making Space for Collective Grief

By month six the organization had lost three colleagues, closed a program, and abandoned a long term strategic direction. None of these losses had been publicly acknowledged. The unspoken rule was to stay positive and move on.

In a full staff meeting we asked, “What are you grieving” Silence came first. Then someone said, “I am grieving who we said we would be. I am afraid we are becoming another group that talks about justice but abandons it when it costs too much.” Others shared grief about colleagues, the closed program, and the loss of faith in the organizations stability.

They did not solve grief. They witnessed it together. They created ritual: a ceremony for the ended program and a shared wall naming losses. They created permission to feel sorrow without performing hope.

Care That Sustains Justice Work

Three months later retention improved and burnout decreased. The crisis had not ended, but the organization had become a place that could hold its people instead of draining them.

The queer staff member said, “Our financial path is uncertain, but our commitment to care and integrity feels real. That is why I am choosing to remain part of this community.”

Pastoral care as political practice does not pretend everything is fine. It insists that peoples wholeness matters more than productivity, especially when resources are scarce.

If you want to rebuild care as infrastructure, contact us at info@relate and transform.org. We would be honored to support your organization as you strengthen care practices during challenging times and transitions.

November 2025
The Conflict that exposed the System

The email was carefully worded, professionally neutral. A staff member requesting mediation because "communication had broken down" with their supervisor. But when we spoke to each person separately, different stories emerged.

The staff member, a Black woman: "I raised concerns about our outreach excluding immigrant communities. I was told I'm not a 'culture fit.'"

The supervisor, white: "She's always finding problems. We can't move forward if everyone's constantly critical."

This wasn't a communication breakdown. This was power, plain as day.

Conflict as Information About Structure

Here's what we've learned: when external pressure increases, conflicts multiply. Not because people are difficult, but because stress exposes what harmony culture has been hiding. And organisations under crisis have enormous pressure to make conflicts disappear quickly. They feel like distractions from survival.

But that "distraction" was telling the truth about their system. Their outreach strategy had been designed by and for white, middle-class communities. When someone pointed out who was being excluded, the response wasn't curiosity, it was defensiveness. That's white supremacy culture at work: framing accountability as "negativity," demanding harmony over justice.

The supervisor genuinely believed she was collaborative. She'd asked for input. But when that input challenged existing approaches, it became "not constructive." The power to define what counts as constructive criticism? That's structural inequity.

Why Standard Mediation Fails

They wanted us to get both people in a room, facilitate better understanding, help them communicate more effectively. We refused.

Conventional mediation assumes roughly equal power. It treats conflict as interpersonal misunderstanding. But when one person can define someone else as "not a culture fit," and the other faces job loss for speaking up, that's not a communication problem requiring better dialogue. That's a power asymmetry requiring structural change.

We worked differently. Slowly. We met separately with each person first, creating space for the staff member to name what she needed without performing palatability for white comfort. Creating space for the supervisor to examine her own defensiveness without immediate pressure to "fix" things.

Then we expanded: What policies allowed "culture fit" to be invoked without clear criteria? Who made decisions about program design and based on whose expertise? How did feedback loops actually function and whose feedback was acted on versus dismissed?

Relational Repair Through Structural Accountability

The resolution wasn't a handshake and mutual understanding. It was changed systems: new processes for program design that included community members being served, explicit criteria for evaluation that removed "culture fit" vagueness, and accountability structures where raising equity concerns became valued rather than penalised.

The relationship between supervisor and staff member didn't become friendship. But it became workable, grounded in structural clarity rather than personal harmony.

The staff member told us months later: "I don't have to trust her personally anymore. I trust the system to hold her accountable."

That's what power-critical conflict work creates: not necessarily warm feelings, but structures where people with less power aren't dependent on those with more power's good intentions.

The Real Work of Accompaniment

Most organisations want conflicts resolved quickly so they can "get back to the work." But conflict is the work. It's your system telling you where justice is breaking down. The question isn't how to eliminate conflict, but how to build structures that can navigate it without reproducing harm.

Are your conflicts revealing power dynamics your current approaches can't address? Let's talk about what it means to accompany conflict in ways that transform systems, not just smooth over symptoms. Reach out to info@relate-and-transform.org. We'll start by understanding what's actually at stake.

August 2025
Power-Critical Crisis Support for Social Change

Understanding the Meta-Crisis: Why Everything Feels Connected

We're not facing isolated problems anymore. Climate breakdown, democratic erosion, economic instability, technological disruption, and rising authoritarianism aren't separate crises, they're interconnected parts of what scholars call the "meta-crisis" or "poly-crisis."

This convergence of systemic breakdowns is happening faster than our institutions can adapt. The result? A cascade of overwhelm that's rippling through every level of society, including the organisations we depend on for social change.

How Organisations Are Responding: The Nervous System of Social Change Organisations

When we spoke with leaders from social justice organisations, we discovered they're exhibiting predictable responses to this meta-crisis, responses that mirror how our nervous systems react to overwhelming threat:

Freeze Response: Strategic decisions get postponed, hoping for "normalisation" that isn't coming

What it looks like: "We'll wait this out" becomes the default strategy
What it means: Protection from overwhelm, but also organisational stagnation

Fight/Flight Response: Hypervigilance and isolation take over

What it looks like: Pulling back from alliances, increased competition for shrinking resources
What it means: Survival mode that prioritises immediate safety over long-term collaboration

Collapse Response: Exhaustion and resignation set in

What it looks like: Diversity programs cut, visionary work abandoned, staff burnout
What it means: System shutdown when resources are completely depleted

These aren't organisational failures, they're intelligent responses to systemic overwhelm. But without support, they threaten the very infrastructure of participation and social change.

The Missing Piece: Collective Regulation

Traditional change management assumes organisations can think their way through crisis. But the meta-crisis activates deeper, somatic responses that require a different approach.

What's needed:

Spaces for collective processing of grief and uncertainty
Understanding of trauma responses as valuable information, not obstacles
Integration of body wisdom and emotional intelligence into organisational strategy
Power-critical analysis that centres marginalised voices in healing processes

Our Approach: Transformation Through Collective Healing

At Relate & Transform, we recognise that healing and justice are inseparable. We support organisations through:

Regulation Before Reorganisation: Building safety and stability before attempting structural change

Power-Critical Values Work: Analysing how crisis responses can reproduce or transform existing inequalities

Embodied Leadership: Developing leadership that integrates personal resilience with systemic change

Participatory Healing: Centring affected communities as experts of their own transformation

Why This Matters Now

The meta-crisis isn't going away. Organisations that learn to navigate it consciously, with healing, justice, and collective wisdom, will become the foundation for whatever comes next.

Those that don't risk becoming part of the problem they set out to solve.

August Offer: Conscious Crisis Navigation Coaching

For Leaders and Teams in Social Change Organisations

What It Is:
A trauma-informed, power-critical coaching program designed to help leaders and teams build resilience, process collective overwhelm, and transform crisis responses into strategies rooted in justice and healing.

You’ll Gain:

Nervous System Literacy for Organisations: Learn to identify freeze, fight/flight, and collapse responses in your team – and shift toward collective regulation.
Embodied Leadership Coaching: Develop the inner resilience needed to lead with clarity and compassion during complex crises.
Crisis-to-Creation Framework: Transform reactive survival strategies into proactive, justice-centered action.
Healing Spaces for Teams: Guided sessions for processing grief, burnout, and uncertainty together, strengthening trust and collaboration.
Power-Critical Perspective: Uncover how systemic power dynamics show up in crisis responses – and use them as a catalyst for equitable change.

1. Resilience Reset: Coaching for Crisis-Ready Leadership

Duration: 8-week program (1:1 or small leadership teams)

What’s Inside:

Somatic Resilience Tools: Practical nervous-system regulation techniques for leaders facing overwhelm.
Vision Clarity Sessions: Move from reactive decision-making to grounded, long-term strategies.
Burnout Recovery Mapping: Identify energy drains and create sustainable rhythms for leadership.
Power-Critical Leadership Lens: Understand how crisis dynamics impact equity and inclusion – and learn to lead with justice at the centre.

Pricing

Individual Leader (1:1): €2,400 - €3,200
Small Leadership Team (2-3 people): €4,800 - €6,400
Payment plans available: 2–4 instalments

Outcome:
Walk away with renewed clarity, embodied resilience, and leadership strategies that balance personal well-being with systemic impact.

2. Collective Healing Lab: Coaching for Organisational Transformation

Duration: 12-week team coaching & facilitation program

What’s Inside:

Team Nervous System Mapping: Identify freeze, fight/flight, and collapse responses within your organisation.
Grief & Uncertainty Processing Circles: Build safe spaces to acknowledge collective stress and reconnect with purpose.
Embodied Collaboration Workshops: Replace competition and isolation with trust-based, co-regulated teamwork.
Justice-Driven Strategy Realignment: Integrate power-awareness into organisational practices to avoid reproducing inequalities.

Pricing

Small Organisation (5-10 team members): €8,000 - €12,000
Medium Organisation (11-25 team members): €12,000 - €18,000
Large Organisation (25+ team members): €18,000 - €25,000+
Payment plans available: 3-6 instalments

Additional Options:

Sliding scale: 20-30% discount for grassroots organisations with limited budgets
Follow-up support sessions: €150-200 per hour (post-program)
Assessment consultation: €300-500 (to determine program fit)

Outcome:
A team that is regulated, connected, and equipped to face the meta-crisis together, with strategies that align healing, justice, and collective action.

Ready to explore what conscious crisis navigation looks like for your work?

"When we help organisations heal through crisis, we're not just saving individual groups – we're strengthening the entire ecosystem of social change."

July 2025
The leadership challenge nobody talks about

The Final Piece of the Crisis Response Puzzle

In our previous newsletters, we examined how today's poly-crisis triggers organisational freeze responses and explored value alignment as a compass through uncertainty. Now we turn to the crucial element that transforms understanding into action: leadership that effectively holds change, both within oneself and across systems.

The Embodied Leader: Internal Holding as Foundation

Conventional leadership approaches separate personal experience from professional responsibility. This division becomes unsustainable during prolonged crisis, when leaders must integrate their own regulation with organisational guidance.

Self-Integration: The Leader's Inner Work

Practice: The Leadership Weather Report

This daily 5-minute reflection helps leaders develop awareness of their internal state:

Scan your physical and emotional state using weather metaphors
Note your internal "temperature" (emotional intensity), "atmospheric pressure" (stress level), and "weather patterns" (emotional patterns/thoughts)
Consider how today's internal weather might influence leadership decisions
Identify one accommodation for current condition

Discomfort Capacity: Beyond Toxic Positivity

Crisis leadership requires comfort with discomfort, staying present with difficult emotions without rushing to premature resolution. Traditional leadership's toxic positivity undermines authentic change by denying transformation's legitimate difficulty.

Leaders who develop greater discomfort capacity stay with difficult change processes significantly longer before seeking premature resolution.

Holding Space for Collective Change

Once leaders develop internal holding capacity, they can create conditions for organisational transformation through three domains:

1. Creating Safety Amidst Uncertainty

Safety isn't the absence of challenge but the presence of trust during difficulty. Leaders create psychological safety by normalising struggle as part of transformation, modelling appropriate vulnerability, and creating transparent processes.

Tool: The Safety-Accountability Matrix Assess your change initiatives across four zones:

Apathy Zone (Low Safety/Low Accountability): Changes stall
Comfort Zone (High Safety/Low Accountability): Changes remain superficial
Anxiety Zone (Low Safety/High Accountability): Changes create burnout
Growth Zone (High Safety/High Accountability): Changes transform systems

2. Supporting Staff Through Change

Crisis exacerbates existing power imbalances and disproportionately impacts marginalised team members. Effective crisis leadership requires:

Recognising differential impact: Crisis affects team members differently based on identity and circumstances
Creating flexible support systems: Multiple pathways that accommodate different needs
Redistributing invisible labour: Making emotional and community care work visible and compensated
Addressing power dynamics explicitly: Transparent resource allocation processes

Tool: Differential Impact Assessment

Map your team including formal/informal roles, identity factors, and external responsibilities
Analyse who will be most affected by changes and who has input
Develop targeted support strategies based on this analysis

Organisations implementing differential impact assessments report much higher retention of marginalised staff during crisis and greater overall wellbeing.

3. Embodying Value Alignment

Values remain theoretical until embodied through leadership practices. Assess your values embodiment through decision alignment, resource allocation, relational practices, and accountability structures.

Tool: Values-Aligned Decision Framework Before significant decisions:

Name the values at stake
Consider tensions between different values
Assess multiple options for how they advance/compromise each value
Make decisions with explicit reference to guiding values
Communicate both the decision and values-based reasoning

Completing the Crisis Response Cycle

This concludes our three-part series:

Acknowledging organisational freeze as natural response to overwhelming challenge
Value alignment as compass for navigating uncertainty
Leadership practices that transform understanding into action

Together, these elements create a comprehensive crisis approach honouring both human realities and organisational imperatives. The path forward isn't returning to pre-crisis stability—it's developing new capacities for thriving amid permanent volatility.

July Special Offer: Integrated Crisis Leadership Development

Leadership Integration Coaching: Six bi-weekly 90-minute sessions plus implementation support focusing on internal regulation, values translation, equitable support systems, and balancing crisis response with long-term vision. €2,499 (+ VAT) for individual leaders

Team Leadership Cohort Programme: Four monthly 3-hour sessions for leadership teams of 4-8, including facilitated practice, collective capacity building, and peer coaching structures. €4,999 (+ VAT) for teams

Request Your Leadership Consultation: Schedule a complimentary 30-minute discovery call at info@relate-and-transform.org

Offers valid through 31 July 2025

June 2025 Value Alignment:
Your Organisation's Compass Through Crisis

From Acknowledging Freeze to Finding Direction

In our previous newsletter, we examined how today's unprecedented convergence of crises—political shifts, AI disruption, and economic instability—has triggered an organisational freeze response across the social impact sector. As we discussed, acknowledging this freeze is the crucial first step toward regulation and recovery.

Now, we turn to the essential question: How do we move forward when the path seems obscured by uncertainty? The answer lies in value alignment—not as a theoretical exercise, but as a practical compass that can guide your organisation through even the most turbulent waters.

Why Values Matter More in Crisis Than in Stability

When operating environments are predictable, organisational values often become background features—important but rarely examined critically. During multi-dimensional crisis, however, values serve three vital functions:

Anchoring amid turbulence: Values provide stability when everything else is in flux. While funding streams, technological capabilities, and political contexts may shift dramatically, your core purpose remains constant.
Decision clarity when options are limited: In crisis, organisations often face impossible choices between competing priorities. Value alignment offers a framework for making difficult decisions that maintain integrity even when ideal solutions aren't available.
Cohesion across distributed teams: As remote work becomes normalised and teams operate across multiple contexts, shared values create connection and purpose that transcend physical distance.

The Misunderstood Practice of Value Alignment

Value alignment is frequently reduced to a performative exercise—creating aspirational statements that look impressive on websites but fail to influence daily decision-making. In crisis conditions, such superficial approaches collapse.

Effective value alignment is not about perfect documents but embodied practices. It requires three elements too often missing in conventional approaches:

1. Honest Assessment: Confronting the Values-Action Gap

Most organisations operate with two parallel value systems:

Espoused values: What we say we believe
Operational values: What actually drives our decisions

During stability, this gap can be obscured. Crisis exposes it mercilessly.

Assessment Tool: The Values-Action Audit

To identify your organisation's values-action gap, gather a diverse group from across your organisation and work through these questions:

Name three decisions your organisation made in the past six months that had significant impact on your work or stakeholders.
For each decision, identify:
- What formally stated organisational values were explicitly referenced in the decision process
- What unstated values or priorities actually seemed to drive the final decision
Where misalignments exist, discuss without judgment: What pressures or systems created this gap?

This exercise often reveals uncomfortable truths: that survival values (institutional preservation, funding security) or colonial legacies (Western expertise privileging, efficiency prioritisation over relationship) may operate more powerfully than the justice, equity, or community-centred values organisations claim to champion.

Acknowledging these gaps isn't about shame—it's about creating the conditions for authentic realignment.

2. Power-Aware Realignment: Beyond Consensus to Justice

Conventional value alignment approaches often seek superficial consensus while avoiding hard conversations about power. A decolonial approach demands we ask more challenging questions:

Whose perspectives shape our understanding of which values matter?
Who benefits when certain values are prioritised over others?
How do our organisational values reflect or challenge dominant systems?

Practice Tool: The Power-Mapping Values Circle

This structured dialogue process helps teams examine values through a power-aware lens:

Preparation: Identify 3-5 core organisational values currently guiding your work
Mapping: For each value, collectively explore:
- Historical context: How has this value been shaped by your organisation's history, funding relationships, and cultural context?
- Power analysis: Who currently defines how this value is interpreted and applied?
- Stakeholder impact: How might different interpretations of this value affect various stakeholders, especially those with least institutional power?
Realignment: Based on this analysis, collaboratively determine:
- Which values require reinterpretation rather than replacement
- Where new values might be needed to address gaps
- How decision-making processes can better integrate values from communities most affected by your work

3. Systemic Integration: Moving from Words to Practice

Once values are clarified, the challenge becomes integration into everyday operations. Without systemic embedding, values remain aspirational rather than operational.

Integration Framework: The Values-Systems Matrix

This practical tool helps transform values from statements to structural realities:

Organisational System

Value Integration Questions

Action Steps

Strategy & Planning

How are our values explicitly reflected in our strategic priorities? Are they measurable?

Create value-aligned metrics for each strategic goal

Resource Allocation

Do our budgeting processes prioritise what we claim to value?

Institute values-based budgeting reviews

Human Resources

How do our hiring, promotion and compensation systems reflect our values?

Redesign performance evaluation to include value alignment

External Relations

Do our partnerships and communications authentically embody our values?

Audit partnerships against value criteria

Governance

How do board composition and decision processes reflect our values?

Create value-accountability mechanisms at governance level

For each system, identify specific practices that either reinforce or undermine your stated values, then develop concrete action steps to address misalignments.

Moving Forward: From Alignment to Action

Value alignment doesn't guarantee easy solutions to crisis challenges, but it provides something equally important: integrity and direction amid uncertainty. When your organisation knows what it truly stands for—not just in statements but in systems—decision-making becomes clearer even when options are constrained.

In our next newsletter, we'll explore how leadership practices can activate value alignment to drive concrete change during crisis. We'll examine specific approaches for leading teams through uncertainty while maintaining the regulated, values-driven stance essential for effective action.

Until then, we invite you to begin with a simple but profound step: create space for honest conversation about your organisation's values-action gap. This courageous dialogue is the foundation for everything that follows.

June Special Offer: Value Alignment for Crisis Navigation

Building on our previous coaching offer focused on regulation, we're now offering specialised support for organisations ready to move from acknowledgment to alignment:

Value Alignment Process Facilitation

Our experienced facilitators guide your team through a structured three-phase process:

Values-Action Assessment: Identifying gaps between stated values and operational realities
Power-Aware Realignment: Collaborative reinterpretation of values with attention to power dynamics
Systems Integration Planning: Developing concrete plans for embedding values across organisational systems

Complete Facilitation Package: Three facilitated sessions (3 hours each) plus implementation support €3,499 (+ VAT) for organisations with up to 15 participants

Values-Based Decision Framework Development

For organisations specifically struggling with crisis decision-making, this focused consultation helps you:

Create clear criteria for values-aligned decisions during uncertainty
Develop protocols for navigating values tensions when they arise
Build transparency mechanisms that maintain trust during difficult choices

Framework Development Package: Two facilitated sessions (2 hours each) plus framework documentation €1,899 (+ VAT) for leadership teams of 4-8 people

Both packages include pre-work assessment tools and post-session implementation support.

[Request Your Values Consultation] Schedule a complimentary 30-minute discovery call to discuss your organisation's specific value alignment needs: info@relate-and-transform.org

Offers valid through July 31, 2025

Navigating the 2025 Poly-crisis: Why Power Critical Change Management Matters Now

The Perfect Storm: Understanding Today's Poly-Crisis Landscape

As we move deeper into 2025, social impact organisations worldwide find themselves caught in an unprecedented convergence of crises. This isn't just another challenging year - it's a fundamental shift in our operational reality.

The political landscape has witnessed a concerning rightward lurch in many regions, with populist, fascist and authoritarian tendencies threatening civil society spaces and human rights frameworks. Meanwhile, the AI revolution continues to transform the social sector at breakneck speed, rendering traditional approaches obsolete while creating demands for entirely new capabilities. Compounding these challenges, economic indicators point to persistent funding instability, with donor priorities, grant availability, and public support all showing troubling volatility.

For NGOs, foundations and change-making organisations, this isn't merely change - it's multi-dimensional crisis requiring a fundamentally different approach to organisational adaptation.

The Freeze Response: A Natural but Dangerous Reaction

In the face of these overwhelming challenges, many social purpose organisations have slipped into what psychologists recognise as a freeze response. This isn't just hesitation or careful consideration - it's an organisational standstill.

The signs are unmistakable:

Mission-critical decisions postponed indefinitely
Programme innovation stalling when it's most needed
Strategic planning replaced by crisis management
Cross-sector collaboration breaking down
Staff and volunteers experiencing burnout or disengagement

This freeze response is entirely understandable - it's a natural human and organisational reaction to overwhelming threat. When faced with multiple crises simultaneously, our systems default to survival mode, conserving energy and retreating from perceived danger.

Why Acknowledgment Matters: The First Step Toward Regulation

Unlike conventional change management approaches that immediately push for action, in a decolonial approach, we must first recognise and legitimise this freeze response. Social impact organisations cannot effectively move forward until they've acknowledged the very real challenges confronting them.

This acknowledgment isn't weakness - it's an embodied necessity. The science of stress response tells us that naming and normalising our reactions is the first step toward regulating them. When we validate that the freeze response is normal in the face of such profound disruption, we create the psychological safety needed to begin the regulation process.

From Freeze to Flow: The Regulation Journey

Moving beyond organisational freeze requires both individual and collective regulation:

Individual Regulation: Every member of an organisation should be equipped to recognise and manage their personal stress responses. Without this foundational capacity, organisational change is in jeopardy.

Collective Regulation: Even more challenging is developing the capacity for co-regulation - the ability of teams and departments to collaboratively process stress and uncertainty together rather than amplifying each other's fear responses.

Essential Regulation Tools for Social Impact Leaders

Conventional change management approaches often overlook the fundamental neurological and somatic reality of crisis response. Our approach integrates proven regulation techniques with social sector practice:

Self-Regulation Tool: Reflective Journalling Practice for Change-Makers

This structured journaling approach creates space to slow down and connect with your emotional experience during crisis. By deliberately attending to anxiety and fear rather than pushing it aside, leaders can develop greater emotional resilience. Set aside 15 minutes in a quiet space with these guiding questions:

What sensations am I noticing in my body right now? (Describe physical sensations without judgment—tightness, heaviness, temperature)
What fears or anxieties am I carrying about our work in this moment? (Name specific concerns without trying to solve them)
How might these emotions be affecting my decisions and interactions? (Notice patterns in your leadership when anxious)
What does this anxiety need from me today? (Sometimes it needs action, sometimes just acknowledgment)
When I connect to our organisation's purpose, what shifts in my emotional state? (Notice how reconnecting to meaning affects physical sensations)

Regular practice helps to develop the capacity to be with difficult emotions rather than becoming overwhelmed by them - an essential skill for leadership in turbulent times.

Co-Regulation Tool: The Collective Meaning-Making Circle

This structured dialogue process helps teams collectively process challenges without becoming overwhelmed. Using a carefully facilitated format that balances emotional honesty with constructive framing, teams develop shared understanding of complex situations and co-create responses aligned with organisational values. This technique has proven especially valuable for international NGOs navigating cross-cultural tensions and competing priorities during crisis.

These aren't merely nice-to-have additions to change management - they're essential prerequisites for any meaningful adaptation in today's poly-crisis environment.

Moving Forward: Your Path Through Uncertainty

In our next newsletter, we'll explore how value alignment serves as the compass that guides social impact organisations through these turbulent waters. Until then, begin by simply acknowledging the freeze response in your own organisation. This recognition alone can begin to thaw the paralysis that's holding back your potential.

Coaching Offer in May & June: Navigate the Freeze Response

Regulation Before Transformation: A Different Approach to Change for Leaders

As you've recognised from this newsletter, conventional change management approaches often fail in today's poly-crisis environment because they don't address the fundamental neurological and somatic realities of organisational freeze.

Our specialised coaching programme helps social impact organisations navigate this critical first phase of crisis response:

Individual Coaching

Our one-to-one leadership coaching provides a confidential space for social sector leaders to:

Slow down and create inner space for overwhelm, anxiety, anger and other strong feelings.
Recognise personal stress responses that may be influencing strategic decisions
Develop personalised regulation strategies that work under funding pressure
Build the cognitive flexibility needed to navigate policy uncertainty
Cultivate resilience practices that prevent burnout during extended advocacy campaigns

6-Session Individual Coaching Package (1.5 hours each, 1 coach): 999 Euro (+ VAT)

Group Coaching

For leadership teams facing collective challenges, our group coaching programme offers:

Team-based regulation practices that build collective resilience
Facilitated conversations about organisational freeze patterns
Co-regulation techniques that transform team dynamics
Shared language and frameworks for navigating uncertainty together

4-Session Group Coaching Programme (2 hours each, 2 facilitators): 2,999 Euro (+ VAT) For teams of 6–8 leaders, smaller groups upon inquiry with 1 facilitator

Packages available until June 30, 2025

[Request Your Consultation] Take the first step toward regulation by scheduling a complimentary 30-minute assessment call to determine which approach best meets your organisation's needs. Contact us via: info@relate-and-transform.org

Newsletter

January 2026 When the whole Organisation Froze